RegionKit RegionKit Open Editor →
Tool comparison

RegionKit vs CVAT — A Practical Comparison

CVAT is the most powerful free annotation tool available, but it requires Docker and a running server. RegionKit is the right choice when you need browser-based ROI zone definition without any infrastructure. Here's how they compare.

Try RegionKit free — no install

Feature comparison

Feature RegionKit CVAT
Installation None — open in any browser Docker or Python server required
Account required No account, ever Account required for teams
Offline support Fully offline after first load Requires a running server
Data privacy Images never leave your device Images stored on your server
ROI / zone focus Primary use case — layers, shared vertices, zone tagging ML training labels; zones are secondary
Export formats Native JSON, COCO, YOLO, PNG COCO, YOLO, VOC, and many more
Team collaboration Share via URL (view or edit) Full team task assignment
AI-assisted labelling Not available SAM, Grounding DINO auto-labelling
Setup time 0 minutes 30–120 minutes
Cost Free Free (self-hosted) / paid cloud

Why people look for a CVAT alternative

CVAT (Computer Vision Annotation Tool) is excellent for large-scale ML training dataset production. If you need to annotate tens of thousands of images for model training with a full team, CVAT is hard to beat.

But CVAT is frequently reached for when the actual task is much simpler: defining a handful of detection zones or exclusion regions on a reference frame so a deployed CV system knows where to look. For that workflow, CVAT is overkill — and its setup requirement is a real obstacle.

Setting up CVAT involves pulling a Docker Compose stack, configuring volumes, exposing a port, and maintaining the server. That's appropriate for a production annotation pipeline. It's not appropriate for a CV engineer who needs to sketch three polygons on a camera frame and export the coordinates before lunch.

What RegionKit does instead

RegionKit is a browser-based ROI editor built specifically for the zone-definition workflow. You open it in any browser — Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari — load an image, draw your zones, and export the coordinates. Nothing to install, no server to maintain, no account to create.

Key differences in the zone-definition use case:

Layers — RegionKit organises regions into named layers (Detection, Exclusion, Tripwires) with independent visibility and lock controls. CVAT has labels and attributes, which work differently and are designed around per-object classification rather than spatial zone organisation.

Shared vertices — When two adjacent zones share a boundary, you can link their shared vertices in RegionKit. Dragging one vertex updates both zones simultaneously, keeping boundaries consistent. This is essential for floor plans and tightly packed detection areas.

Offline-first — Once the page loads, RegionKit works without an internet connection. CVAT requires a running server at all times.

Publish and share — If you need to share a scene for review, RegionKit lets you publish to a URL with one click. The recipient can view — or, if you share an edit link, publish their own changes.

When to use CVAT instead

CVAT wins when you need:

If you're building a training dataset with a team, use CVAT. If you're defining zones for a deployed system, try RegionKit — you'll be drawing zones in under a minute.

Try RegionKit — it's free

Browser-based ROI editor. No install, no account, no data upload.

Open the Editor